Reviewer Guide

Review Process Instructions:

  1. The goal of review process in Gharyan Journal of Technology, is to publish scientific research that includes quality, credibility, objectivity, and neutrality.
  2. Gharyan Journal of Technology follows the double anonymous peer review system, where both the author and the reviewer do not know the identity of the other, in order to ensure objectivity and integrity in the evaluation.
  3. Gharyan Journal of Technology reviewers shall follow the following standards: The originality of the research, which is to extent of the new addition to scientific research. Scientific importance, that includes scientific value of research in its field and its contribution to knowledge. Clarity of the problem and objectives, that follow formulation clarity of the problem, objectives and questions. Scientific models, to commitment the adapting the research requirements to the nature of the research, as well as specifying data analysis tools. Analyzing and discussing the results, which requires depth of analysis and connection to the theoretical framework of the research. Documentation of references and sources, those require the following the guide of documentation in Gharyan Journal of Technology. Language and scientific method, which requires the integrity of the language and the accuracy of the wording and reasoning. Following the general format of Gharyan Journal of Technology, by matching the research to the journal template.
  1. The responsibilities of the reviewer include maintaining neutrality and objectivity in the evaluation, as well as preserving the confidentiality of the research and submitting a detailed and clear review report, in addition to indicating any similarity or plagiarism.
  2. Reviewer decisions shall include one of the following decisions: the validity of publishing the research without modifications, the validity of publishing the research after making the required or attached modifications, and finally, the invalidity of publishing the research for the reasons mentioned or attached.
  3. General notes: The Review decisions are final after approval by the editorial board, further The research may be sent to more than one reviewer when needed. Finally, the editorial board also reserves the right to request additional amendments when needed.