This is an outdated version published on 2026-06-05. Read the most recent version.

Impact of Rock Properties on Density Estimation Using Core Data

Authors

  • Khaled Taleb Faculty of Engineering ,Gharyan University, Libya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66660/ghyn.v1i11.114

Keywords:

density rock, porosity, hydrocarbon reservoir rock, bulk density.

Abstract

A material's density, which is calculated by dividing its mass by its volume, is one of its fundamental characteristics.  However, it might be challenging to determine a correct density for some rock types.  Numerous factors contribute to this challenge, including the material's uneven volume, porosity, moisture content, permeability, and the absence of a precise definition of density.

Accurately estimating the overall volume of the rock core is the primary challenge in calculating its bulk density.  We did not look only into four popular methods for determining a material's bulk density, but also looked at the problem of the rock core becoming saturated with moisture.  A variety of seven distinct types of rock were used for this testing, ranging from extremely permeable sandstone and blast furnace slag with a significant amount of internal pore space to highly competent granite and dolomites. In addition we looked at four distinct approaches that are frequently used to calculate a material's bulk density.

 These techniques included the caliper method, wax immersion, instantaneous water immersion, and wax-shrink wrap immersion.  The wax-immersion method was found to be the most accurate of the four techniques examined.  This resulted from the liquid waxes' capacity to closely conform to the sample's surface pores, providing the most precise estimation of the sample's volume.

References

M. A. Mahmod , M .A .A l Marhoun, Calculation for fluid physical property prediction. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 23,1996

Salem ,H.S. Determination of porosity ,formation resistivity Factor, Archie cementation Factor and Pore geometry for a Glacial aquifer, Energy Sources ,1July 2001, vol.23,n06,pp.589-594 .

BEAL,C,.Trans,AIME Handbook of physical properties of rocks and minerals,1964

Naseri, A.,Nikazar,M.,Mousavi, Anumarical technique for an accurate determination of formation resistivity using FR – RO Overlays method "Arab J Geosic(2015)

BEAL,C,.Trans,AIME Handbook of physical properties of rocks and minerals,1964

Walsh J, Brace W. The effect of pressure on porosity and the transport properties of rock. J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea. 1984;89:9425-31

Jaeger JC, Cook NGW, Zimmerman RW. Fundamentals of rock mechanics, 4th ed. New York: Wiley; 2009

Soeder DJ, Randolph PL. Porosity, permeability, and pore structure of the tight

Mesaverde sandstone, Piceance Basin, Colorado. SPE Formation Eval. 2013;2:129

Metwally YM, Sondergeld CH. Measuring low permeabilities of gas-sands and shales using a pressure transmission technique. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2011;48:1135-44

David C, Wong T-F, Zhu W, Zhang J. Laboratory measurement of compaction-induced permeability change in porous rocks: Implications for the generation and maintenance of pore pressure excess in the crust. Pure Appl. Geophys. 1994;143:425-56.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-10 — Updated on 2026-06-05

Versions

How to Cite

Taleb, K. (2026). Impact of Rock Properties on Density Estimation Using Core Data. Gharyan Journal of Technology, 1(11), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.66660/ghyn.v1i11.114 (Original work published December 10, 2025)

Issue

Section

Articles